Mixed response to new dog-chipping legislation in East Lancashire

PLANS to bring in compulsory micro-chipping for dogs has received a mixed reaction in East Lancashire.

The Government said the idea would help reunite owners with lost or stolen pets as well as improving the welfare of dogs.

Ministers also announced plans to extend legal protection over dog attacks to cover incidents on private property.

In East Lancashire, MPs welcomed the news but the boss of a stray dogs charity said it was ‘unfair’ on responsible dog owners.

Rossendale and Darwen MP Jake Berry, who owns a poodle called Lola, said he was all in favour of the move.

He said: “It is a massively important issue and people must take responsibility for their dogs.

“You can get your dog micro-chipped for just £10 now.

“To be blunt, the cost of micro-chipping is about the same as what it costs to feed a dog for a week.

“So if people say they can’t afford the chip then they can’t afford to feed their dog and shouldn’t have one.”

Pendle MP Andrew Stephenson said: “I warmly welcome the move, it is a step in the right direction.

“For too long, responsible dog owners have been criticised because of the acts of the minority.”

Steve Wood, of Hyndburn Stray Dogs In Need, said he had some concerns about the plans.

He said: “In theory micro-chipping is fantastic. You pick up a stray dog, scan it and the details of the owners appear and they can be reunited.

“But 90 per cent of the time, you ring the number that comes up and they will say, ‘oh, we sold the dog’.

“The majority of stray dogs are not kept by responsible people.

“So to make law-abiding people micro-chip their dog when they don’t want to is unfair in my opinion.

“A lot of people, especially those who show dogs, don’t want to stick a big needle into their pets.”

Announcing the move, Environment Secretary Owen Paterson said: “It is ludicrous that in a nation of dog lovers, thousands of dogs are roaming the streets or stuck in kennels because the owner cannot be tracked down.

“I am determined to put an end to this and ease the pressure on charities and councils to find new homes for these dogs.

“Microchipping is a simple solution that gives peace of mind to owners. It makes it easier to get their pet back if it strays and easier to trace if it is stolen.”

Comments(11)

Rimbus says...
7:07pm Thu 7 Feb 13

I don't know about micro-chipping dogs, what about micro-chipping some of the retards wandering the street with their 'Staffies' and other bull terrier type dogs usually with their hoodies up, the hand not holding lead stuffed down the front of their joggers, black trainers, white socks and spotty faces! lol.

happycyclist says...
7:07pm Thu 7 Feb 13

What's the point of making it compulsory? Those who think it's a good idea will happily pay the tenner to get it done anyway, and the rest just aren't fussed and aren't going to bother. Who the hell is going to police this? Are the police going to be doing spot check on the responsible dog owners who have their dogs on leads? Like they've got time for that! And how do they deal with the dogs that aren't chipped and where nobody will admit to it being their dog?
Did I wake up in another dimension this morning or is every LT report today just plain bonkers?

buckoff says...
7:32pm Thu 7 Feb 13

I got mine chipped last week at RSPCA at Accrington £10. Anyone that loves there dog will have it chipped and don't need the law to tell them. The problem is them that don't will not pay the fine if caught. And making breeders chip them is not possible because smaller dogs can't be chipped till 12 wks old.

juanbbien says...
7:38pm Thu 7 Feb 13

Animal rescue centres are saying that more than ever dogs are being abandoned due to the state of the countries austerity situation,so why would this growing number of people abandoning them want them chipping.

nmclean77 says...
7:57pm Thu 7 Feb 13

Maybe people can budget for £10 a week to feed a dog, but not afford the EXTRA £10 to chip the dog?

In fairness, maybe breeders shouldn't release dogs until 12weeks old, then the dogs can be chipped.

I can see the theory behind all this, but to implement it and make it become a reality will be too costly.

clickhere says...
10:08pm Thu 7 Feb 13

Another bonkers Cameron idea.

Won't stop the irresponsible owners allowing their mutts to c**p all over the place. And as for the owners who scoop the poop then hang the bag on a tree or garden wall, well I just cannot see the logic of that!

Good call says...
11:01pm Thu 7 Feb 13

Another step along the totalitarian tiptoe.In 10-15 years, they will start microchipping humans, first under the guise of monitoring sex offenders and violent criminals or finding missing children and then they will make it mandatory for everyone.If you think i am crazy, would you have believed me 30 years ago if I was saying that we would be having body scanners,ANPR, Fingerprinting in schools, Facial recognition and Smart meters introduced into society.

cristina@naturewatch.org says...
12:45pm Fri 8 Feb 13

All dogs to be microchipped by 2016 - this is not the answer.

If that was not bad enough, the consultation itself was flawed from the outset, as it failed to address a crucial factor in determining a vital element in the problems surrounding dangerous dogs and the UK dog population that currently exist - THE SOURCE. Instead their focus was on micro-chipping as a panacea for dangerous dogs. Naturewatch believes that micro-chipping alone will have little impact on the existing cruelty to dogs by irresponsible owners. Nor will it satisfactorily address the issue of dog bites. We believe also that it will do little to address the overpopulation crisis in rehoming centres.
http://naturewatch.o
rg/press/article/mic
rochipping-is-not-th
e-answer-government-
get-out

cristina@naturewatch.org says...
12:45pm Fri 8 Feb 13

All dogs to be microchipped by 2016 - this is not the answer.

If that was not bad enough, the consultation itself was flawed from the outset, as it failed to address a crucial factor in determining a vital element in the problems surrounding dangerous dogs and the UK dog population that currently exist - THE SOURCE. Instead their focus was on micro-chipping as a panacea for dangerous dogs. Naturewatch believes that micro-chipping alone will have little impact on the existing cruelty to dogs by irresponsible owners. Nor will it satisfactorily address the issue of dog bites. We believe also that it will do little to address the overpopulation crisis in rehoming centres.
http://naturewatch.o
rg/press/article/mic
rochipping-is-not-th
e-answer-government-
get-out

Joseph Yossarian says...
1:09pm Fri 8 Feb 13

The cats are behind it.

Joseph Yossarian says...
4:33pm Fri 8 Feb 13

A dog was stolen from near me recently.

It was recovered because the police found the dog miles away whilst doing a drugs raid.

The dog was microchipped and because of this was retured home.

Get your dog chipped.

Of course it won't stop cruelty. But if you lose our dog it increases the probability of it being returned.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree