Mixed response to new dog-chipping legislation in East Lancashire (From Chorley Citizen)
When news happens, text CIT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
Mixed response to new dog-chipping legislation in East Lancashire
7:00pm Thursday 7th February 2013 in East Lancashire
By Dan Clough, Reporter
PLANS to bring in compulsory micro-chipping for dogs has received a mixed reaction in East Lancashire.
The Government said the idea would help reunite owners with lost or stolen pets as well as improving the welfare of dogs.
Ministers also announced plans to extend legal protection over dog attacks to cover incidents on private property.
In East Lancashire, MPs welcomed the news but the boss of a stray dogs charity said it was ‘unfair’ on responsible dog owners.
Rossendale and Darwen MP Jake Berry, who owns a poodle called Lola, said he was all in favour of the move.
He said: “It is a massively important issue and people must take responsibility for their dogs.
“You can get your dog micro-chipped for just £10 now.
“To be blunt, the cost of micro-chipping is about the same as what it costs to feed a dog for a week.
“So if people say they can’t afford the chip then they can’t afford to feed their dog and shouldn’t have one.”
Pendle MP Andrew Stephenson said: “I warmly welcome the move, it is a step in the right direction.
“For too long, responsible dog owners have been criticised because of the acts of the minority.”
Steve Wood, of Hyndburn Stray Dogs In Need, said he had some concerns about the plans.
He said: “In theory micro-chipping is fantastic. You pick up a stray dog, scan it and the details of the owners appear and they can be reunited.
“But 90 per cent of the time, you ring the number that comes up and they will say, ‘oh, we sold the dog’.
“The majority of stray dogs are not kept by responsible people.
“So to make law-abiding people micro-chip their dog when they don’t want to is unfair in my opinion.
“A lot of people, especially those who show dogs, don’t want to stick a big needle into their pets.”
Announcing the move, Environment Secretary Owen Paterson said: “It is ludicrous that in a nation of dog lovers, thousands of dogs are roaming the streets or stuck in kennels because the owner cannot be tracked down.
“I am determined to put an end to this and ease the pressure on charities and councils to find new homes for these dogs.
“Microchipping is a simple solution that gives peace of mind to owners. It makes it easier to get their pet back if it strays and easier to trace if it is stolen.”
Comments(11)
happycyclist
says...
7:07pm Thu 7 Feb 13
Did I wake up in another dimension this morning or is every LT report today just plain bonkers?
buckoff
says...
7:32pm Thu 7 Feb 13
juanbbien
says...
7:38pm Thu 7 Feb 13
nmclean77
says...
7:57pm Thu 7 Feb 13
In fairness, maybe breeders shouldn't release dogs until 12weeks old, then the dogs can be chipped.
I can see the theory behind all this, but to implement it and make it become a reality will be too costly.
clickhere
says...
10:08pm Thu 7 Feb 13
Won't stop the irresponsible owners allowing their mutts to c**p all over the place. And as for the owners who scoop the poop then hang the bag on a tree or garden wall, well I just cannot see the logic of that!
Good call
says...
11:01pm Thu 7 Feb 13
cristina@naturewatch.org
says...
12:45pm Fri 8 Feb 13
If that was not bad enough, the consultation itself was flawed from the outset, as it failed to address a crucial factor in determining a vital element in the problems surrounding dangerous dogs and the UK dog population that currently exist - THE SOURCE. Instead their focus was on micro-chipping as a panacea for dangerous dogs. Naturewatch believes that micro-chipping alone will have little impact on the existing cruelty to dogs by irresponsible owners. Nor will it satisfactorily address the issue of dog bites. We believe also that it will do little to address the overpopulation crisis in rehoming centres.
http://naturewatch.o
rg/press/article/mic
rochipping-is-not-th
e-answer-government-
get-out
cristina@naturewatch.org
says...
12:45pm Fri 8 Feb 13
If that was not bad enough, the consultation itself was flawed from the outset, as it failed to address a crucial factor in determining a vital element in the problems surrounding dangerous dogs and the UK dog population that currently exist - THE SOURCE. Instead their focus was on micro-chipping as a panacea for dangerous dogs. Naturewatch believes that micro-chipping alone will have little impact on the existing cruelty to dogs by irresponsible owners. Nor will it satisfactorily address the issue of dog bites. We believe also that it will do little to address the overpopulation crisis in rehoming centres.
http://naturewatch.o
rg/press/article/mic
rochipping-is-not-th
e-answer-government-
get-out
Joseph Yossarian
says...
1:09pm Fri 8 Feb 13
Joseph Yossarian
says...
4:33pm Fri 8 Feb 13
It was recovered because the police found the dog miles away whilst doing a drugs raid.
The dog was microchipped and because of this was retured home.
Get your dog chipped.
Of course it won't stop cruelty. But if you lose our dog it increases the probability of it being returned.
Rimbus says...
7:07pm Thu 7 Feb 13