When news happens, text CIT and your photos and videos to 80360. Or contact us by email or phone.
4:00pm Monday 20th February 2012 in News
By Chris Gee, Reporter
A MAN has been banned from his family home for five years after more than 50 complaints were made about arguing, fighting and general nuisance at the address.
A judge at Burnley County Court agreed a court order which effectively bans Craig Clarke, 26, from the family home in Hallwood Road, Chorley.
The order was made after landlord Chorley Community Housing (CCH) took legal action against tenant Amanda Grindley, 29, after three neighbours made complaints about Clarke’s allegedly violent and aggressive behaviour at the home which Grindley shared with Clarke and their two children.
The court has ordered that Grindley, who is the tenant of CCH, must exclude Clarke from the house with effect from 4pm February 15 and must refuse him entry if he tries to return.
If she allows Clarke to return to the house during the next five years then she is a risk of losing her home. Legal action was initially taken by CCH to exclude Clarke from the house in August 2010 as the landlord felt that he was the cause of many of the problems at the house.
However, at the first return hearing Grindley supported Clarke’s return to the family home and he was allowed back on the proviso that he behaved himself.
Despite the court injunction and other action by the landlord the problems continued and CCH took further legal action against Clarke and issued possession proceedings in respect of Grindley.
Tenancy enforcement officer Anna Schickhoff-Brown said: “Neighbours have been suffering because of Clarke and Grindley's behaviour for more than two years.
“Applying for possession was a last resort.
“If Ms Grindley does not abide by the court’s order then we will seek her eviction and she risks making herself and her two young children homeless.”
Comments(9)
Your ferret stinks
says...
6:16pm Mon 20 Feb 12
doleboytrotter wrote:Here we go again with the P.C. nutters coming out with stupid statements.
what about his human rights.
Ex_Darwen_Tech
says...
6:23pm Mon 20 Feb 12
everywhere is sh1t
says...
7:03pm Mon 20 Feb 12
Ex_Darwen_Tech wrote:i must agree
I would suspect that the comment by doleboytrotter was a tongue in cheek comment. We have all read about folks that are not allowed to be deported because their "human rights" of a family life would be violated. Even after they have killed someone! So, what about Mr. Clarkes right to a family life? Is being banned (deported) from his home and family not as bad as being deported from the country?
Between_the_lions
says...
7:11pm Mon 20 Feb 12
everywhere is sh1t wrote:Based on other posts I agree on the tongue in cheek nature of the post.
Ex_Darwen_Tech wrote:i must agree
I would suspect that the comment by doleboytrotter was a tongue in cheek comment. We have all read about folks that are not allowed to be deported because their "human rights" of a family life would be violated. Even after they have killed someone! So, what about Mr. Clarkes right to a family life? Is being banned (deported) from his home and family not as bad as being deported from the country?
Your ferret stinks
says...
8:45pm Mon 20 Feb 12
White Eagle
says...
9:22pm Mon 20 Feb 12
whirlingdervish
says...
10:45pm Mon 20 Feb 12
metz1969
says...
1:18pm Wed 29 Feb 12
Search jobs in and around Chorley
Search Now »
Find the right person for you in Chorley
Search Now »
Search houses, flats, and all properties in Chorley
Search Now »
Search new & used cars in and around Chorley
Search Now »
doleboytrotter says...
4:30pm Mon 20 Feb 12